Addressing Annotation Complexity: The Case of Annotating Ideological Perspective in Egyptian Social Media
نویسندگان
چکیده
Automatically detecting the stance of people toward political and ideological topics –namely their “Ideological Perspective”– from social media is a rapidly growing research area with a wide range of applications. Research in such a field faces several challenges among which is the lack of annotated corpora and associated guidelines for collecting annotations. The problem is even more pronounced in situations where there is no clear taxonomy for the common community perspectives and ideologies. The challenges are exacerbated when the communities where we need to gather these annotations are in a state of turmoil causing subjectivity and intimidation to be factors in the annotation process. Accordingly, we present the process for creating a robust and succinct set of guidelines for annotating “Egyptian Ideological Perspectives”. We collect social media data discussing Egyptian politics and develop an iterative feedback annotation framework refining the annotation task and associated guidelines attempting to circumvent both weaknesses. Our efforts lead to a significant increase in inter-annotator agreement measures from 75.7% to 92% overall agreement.
منابع مشابه
Annotation in Architecture: A Systematic Approach toward Mobilization and Development of Theoretical, Research, and Critical Basis in Architecture
Annotations usually refer to marginal notes that explain a difficult or ambiguous subject, provide a general definition or a critical remark for a particular part of a text. Historically, annotating was a well-known tradition in Islamic sciences and was used especially in times when there were less new potentials for generating new knowledge. The main question of this research is, can the tradi...
متن کاملVox Populi Annotation: Measuring Intensity of Ideological Perspectives by Aggregating Group Judgments
Polarizing discussions about political and social issues are common in mass media. Annotations on the degree to which a sentence expresses an ideological perspective can be valuable for evaluating computer programs that can automatically identify strongly biased sentences, but such annotations remain scarce. We annotated the intensity of ideological perspectives expressed in 250 sentences by ag...
متن کاملAnnotating Question Types in Social Q&A Sites
In all domains, including eHumanities, it is crucial to understand how people seek information and what kinds of questions they ask. In this paper, we present an annotation study of domain-specific questions collected from the current leading social Question and Answer site, namely Yahoo! Answers. We define an annotation scheme with 9 question types and additional attributes to identify unclear...
متن کاملThe Representation of Iran’s Nuclear Program in British Newspaper Editorials: A Critical Discourse Analytic Perspective
In this study, Van Dijk’s (1998) model of CDA was utilized in order to examine the representation of Iran’s nuclear program in editorials published by British news casting companies. The analysis of the editorials was carried out at two levels of headlines and full text stories with regard to the linguistic features of lexical choices, nominalization, passivization, overcompleteness, and voice....
متن کاملA Separation, an Ideological Rift in the Iranian Society and Culture: Media, Discourse and Ideology
Media can be a good representation of dominant ideologies in society. The analysis of such discourse can shed light on the mental and social structures of people in society. Adopting van Dijk’s (1995) layout of discourse ideology and his (2000) practical and general outline of ideological analysis, this study analyzes the Iranian movie A Separation, the winner of the 84th An...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016